The death of Fido, the Lincoln family dog

Fido (probably in 1865)

Fido, probably taken in 1865 (everythinglincoln.com)

Fido, a yellow mongrel dog the Abraham Lincoln family adopted about 1855, stayed behind when the Lincolns moved to Washington, D.C., in 1861 and was stabbed to death sometime in 1866. The man who killed Fido has gone down in history as a shiftless drunk, but that characterization might be unfair.

John E. Roll

John E. Roll

When they left town, the Lincolns gave the dog to the family of John E. Roll, who had known President Lincoln since New Salem days and whose sons, John L. and Frank, were friends with Willie and Tad Lincoln.

Lincoln’s friend and barber, William Fleurville, updated President Lincoln on Fido in an 1862 letter:

Tell Taddy that his and Willie’s dog is alive and kicking, doing well. He stays mostly at John E. Rolls with his boys who are about the age now that Tad and Willie were when they left for Washington.

The classic story of Fido’s killing was reported in an Illinois State Journal column written by Journal editor J. Emil Smith on Feb. 3, 1931. Smith said John E. Roll gave the following account to a reporter for a magazine whose name and date were unrecorded; John L. Roll showed the magazine story to Smith, who quoted from it.

The circumstances were as follows: Charlie Plank, a half-drunken man, was one day whittling a pine stick when Fido came bounding along and, as usual, sprang forward with his fore feet raised. In drunken rage, the man thrust his knife into the animal, and poor Fido ran away, not to be found for a month after, when his lifeless body was discovered under an old church.

Poor old Fido was buried by loving hands in a spot that is kept sacred to this day.

Smith, and perhaps the unknown magazine writer, misspelled the last name of Fido’s killer. As Matthew Algeo determined for his 2015 book, Abe & Fido: Lincoln’s Love of Animals and the Touching Story of His Favorite Canine Companion, the knife-wielding man was one Charles E. Planck, 24, a clerk and the son of Springfield grocer Jacob C. Planck.

Algeo quotes an unnamed city resident as saying Planck was “somewhat given to intoxicating beverage.” Planck “had not accomplished much of anything in life,” Algeo writes, adding that he later “slithered back into the obscurity he so richly deserved.”

Whether or not Planck was a drunk, he may have deserved more sympathy than he got from Algeo. For one thing, Planck had volunteered for Civil War service; he was a member of Company G of the 114th Illinois Infantry Regiment over the entire period – summer 1862 to spring 1865 – of the 114th’s existence and rose to the rank of corporal. Included in the 114th’s record were the battles of Nashville and Brice’s Crossroads.

There’s also the question of whether Planck meant to kill Fido. A Journal story in February 1893 put a different spin on the incident.

He (Fido) was exceedingly friendly and had a habit of showing his congeniality by depositing his muddy yellow fore paws plump on the breast of any one who addressed him familiarly. His excessive friendliness eventually caused his death in a very unique way, in that Fido suffered the fate of his master – assassination. The dog, which was a yellow fellow of moderate size, ran against Charlie Plank, who was whittling a stick with a sharp, long bladed knife. By an accidental move while the dog was expressing himself in caresses the blade was buried deep in his body. He shot out the door like a flash and was never seen again alive. His body was found about a month afterwards where he had lain down to die behind the chimney of the old Universalist church.

It is true that Planck had at least two encounters with local law enforcement following his Army discharge, but one was as a victim, and in the other he seems not to have been totally at fault.

In the first case, Planck was beaten and robbed by two men on North Seventh Street in September 1865. The second involved an argument at Fourth and Washington streets in March 1868 between Planck and Peter Burns. The dispute ended, according to the Journal, when “Planck drew a revolver loaded with small shot, and fired, wounding Burns slightly in the shoulder.”

On March 6, the day after the fight, Burns was fined $3 “for using language to Charles Planck, calculated to provoke a breach of the peace.” (Burns had a violent record. The same day he was fined for instigating the shooting, Burns was fined another $20 for assaulting Josephine Howard, and a third case against him, for assaulting Mary Ward, was carried over. Later that spring, Burns was accused of assault with intent to kill, although that charge was dismissed.)

When Planck appeared in court March 10, he was ordered merely to “give $500 bonds to keep the peace, and was released from arrest,” the Journal reported. He apparently faced no other penalty.

Sometime in the 1870s, Planck and his wife Hattie (they had married in 1867) moved to Michigan, where Planck worked as a clerk and “expressman.” He died on March 21, 1917, at the Grand Rapids Veterans Home, where he is buried.schs logo (2)

Original content copyright Sangamon County Historical Society. You are free to republish this content as long as credit is given to the Society.

 

This entry was posted in Animals, Crime and vice, Lincoln, Abraham. Bookmark the permalink.

12 Responses to The death of Fido, the Lincoln family dog

  1. ALPHONSE DATTOLO says:

    WHETHER IS WAS DRUNK OR NOT THIS HUMAN ANIMAL (CHARLES PLANCK) SHOULD HAVE RECEIVED MANY YEARS IN JAIL FOR WHAT HE DID TO DR. LINCOLN’S DOG, POOR FIDO WHO WAS PART OF THE LINCOLN FAMILY FROM 1855-1866.. AFTER RECEIVING THE KNIFE WOUND IN THE STOMACH FIDO TRIED TO GO HOME. WHEN HE REACHED AN OLD CHURCH HE COULD NOT WALK ANYMORE. HE COLLAPSED IN BACK OF THE CHURCH AND HIS LITTLE BODY WAS NOT FOUND FOR ALMOST ONE MONTH. JOHN AND FRANK ROLL TO WHOM DR LINCOLN GAVE FIDO, BURIED HIM ON THE CHURCH GROUNDS. DR. LINCOLN DID NOT TAKE HIM TO THE WHITE HOUSE. BUT WE BELIEVE THAT HE PURCHASED ANOTHER DOG IN WASHINGTON MANED JIP OR GYP

  2. aeh says:

    THAT IS SAD:(

  3. Emma Nuckols says:

    That is really really bad pore fido.

  4. EVA says:

    SO SAD!!!!!!!!!!!! POOR FIDO

  5. Katrina Jordan-Hechtman says:

    Lincoln was never a doctor. He was a Senator, Carpenter, and later President. My mother’s 4th great uncle John Eddy Roll is the man who took responsibility for the dog after the Lincolns went to Washington DC. He and his brothers lovingly cherished their friendship with the Lincoln’s sons.

    • PROFESSOR ALPHONSE DATTOLO says:

      LINCOLN WAS INDEED A DOCTOR. HE RECEIVED THREE HONORARY PhD DEGREES-ONE FROM KNOX COLLEGE, ONE FROM COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY AND ONE FROM PRINCETON UNIVERSITY ON DECEMBER 20,1864.

  6. Pingback: Just for Fun: 21 Odd but Intriguing Facts – The Accolade

  7. Fred Fitch says:

    I think people probably assumed the worst abut Planck because of the implied symmetry–as the master had been murdered by a scapegrace, so had his dog.

    I have met many hundreds of dogs in my life, with a great variety of names–nary a Fido. But it’s always been this name associated with dogs in literature–to the point where it’s a generic name used to refer to dogs in general.

    I would suspect the hagiography surrounding Lincoln led to many people giving their dogs that name for generations after, and even when the name went out of fashion (because it had become too much of a cliche), people went on associating it with dogs, in spite of never having met a dog that went by that name.

    • editor says:

      Mr. Fitch: “Fido” is from the Latin meaning “trust” or “faithful,” so it’s easy to see how it became a dog’s name. But, yeah, a lot of sources seem to agree that Abe’s use of the name is what made it so popular for a time. Thanks for the perceptive comment.

  8. James Delaney says:

    Given Mr. Plank’s military record and modern experience with the effects of combat, it might be reasonable to consider the possibility that Plank was suffering from PTSD. There were tens of thousands of afflicted veterans of that war wandering around the country -and the West- without any understanding or treatment. Fido didn’t deserve his end, but it may have come at the hand of a man who had not only fought for his master but one who was suffering the effects of combat for the same master.

  9. lauren says:

    i hate charles planck!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! GGGRRRRRRRRRR

  10. Pingback: How Did Fido Become the Default Name for a Dog | Glassview Farm

Leave a Reply to Katrina Jordan-Hechtman Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *